Showing posts with label Small groups. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Small groups. Show all posts
Monday, December 3, 2012
Best idea/Biggest Challenge
Either to start a large group discussion or to wrap up a small group discussion, have people share the best idea they come up with and what was the biggest challenge in the reading (large group) or discussion (small group). This will tend to bring up a wide range of ideas from different people. It also lets people air what they struggled with and get new perspectives on those challenges from other students.
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Rotating tables
Divide into small groups and each sit at one table. Each table gets a question on the reading written on a big paper. The groups write answers to the question, then move onto the next table. At the end, each group has been to each table and written answers to each question. When people are back where they started, go around the room and have each group summarize the responses for the class. Everyone's perspectives will be heard, and groups get to consider many different perspectives.
Google document discussion
Have one Google Document for the class, and each group is assigned one section to fill in as they discuss.
You can see what other groups are talking about at the same time, so you can collaborate with separate groups in real time. It also gives a final product that
people can go back to for reference.
Puzzle pieces
This activity works well for citations, but could also be used for other things. Citations were broken up on separate pieces of paper and
teams competed to make a correct citation first by sorting the pieces into the right order. It was engaging and sort of exciting, uses teamwork. Competition is an incentive for some
learners. Can build and add more
types, then it can serve as review and learning new concepts. Could also have people each hold a card
and arrange themselves in order.
This involves more movement.
Aha!/Mmhmm/Say what?
Groups divide paper into three sections. Aha! is something that they hadn't realized or thought of before but they like. Mmhmm is something they had thought of before but agree with. Say what? is something that they do not agree with from the article. It's a focused discussion that
draws people back into the text. It allows people to air concerns they had about the reading or places they
thought were strange or particularly interesting. Individuals could also do with post-its as they read.
Four-square
Divide a large paper into four quadrants- definition,
symbols, examples, challenges.
Using information from the reading, fill in each quadrant. Define any confusing terms, use symbols and drawings to show meaning, give a couple real-life examples, and then list some challenges that may arise. The captions for each quadrant can
change depending on the reading. The four sections allow students to conceptualize something in four different ways. Different sections are good for
different learning styles, and it’s all very collaborative.
Jigsaw
Each small group gets one part of an article to become
“experts” on. The groups read and discuss,
then share their conversations with the whole group. Once everyone has presented, then the sections of the article should fit together like the pieces of a puzzle. It allows students to focus on one part of an article rather than the whole thing, which makes it a little easier to digest and helps focus thinking.
Sliding group members
Small group discussion on a question, then one group member
shifts to the next group (in a circle) and explains what their group talked
about. Then get a new question in
new groups. This gets different perspectives
into existing groups and gets people talking to new people. Choose a random characteristic to
decide who rotates rather than having groups pick (closest birthday, who stayed
up latest, etc). Could also do a
game to pick, like “the nose goes”. Having questions printed helps, as does having them
individually on different colors of paper to help groups keep track of where they are.
Continuum
Students sort cards in a spectrum according to any criterion you want to set. This can be done in small groups or as one large group. One example would be sorting different teaching techniques from a reading assignment in order of how helpful you found them.
Diamond sorting
Give each small group 9 cards. Each person gets one or two to write a statement about the reading on- it can be something they agree or disagree with. The group should then sort the cards into rows of 1, 2, 3, 2, and 1 in a diamond shape. The 1 at the top is something the group strongly agrees with, row 2 is somewhat agree, 3 is neutral, 2 somewhat disagree, and 1 strongly disagree. You can also have people write cards then trade with another group. This way, no one needs to argue for their own statements to be in a certain place and people may feel more comfortable. It's a collaborative activity that lets people think about the strengths and weaknesses of an article or chapter.
Index card sorting
Write one example (or
problem, etc) on each of 6-10 index card and have groups sort cards into sets in different ways
that make sense. Then move to a new table and guess how that group sorted their cards. This helps people think about the concepts. It is social, collaborative, and tactile and allows for moving at
different speeds
Spider Diagrams
Spider diagrams help students think relationally about various topics. A central topic is given, then several subsets. Students work in groups to categorize items from the reading or other subject as a web all coming off of the central topic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)